http://www.ebay.com/itm/1965-Buick-...ash=item33d35b2efe:g:Bl4AAOSwpjRZcn34&vxp=mtr Beware of seller, he is telling a pack of lies. He told me that the car is his father's, and that he bought it in 2001, and his father has already signed the title. He actually bought the car last month on CL for $8k, and the title is signed by the previous owner, who bought it in 2001. Here is the previous owner's (Richard) reaction to reading the ebay ad: "Wow, that description is completely fabricated! Shows you how many shady sellers are out there". I am fine with someone buying a car and flipping it, but at least be honest about the car....
Ughh, this sounds like the moron I bought my car from. "Dual exhaust works as it should". E-brake intact but not working. No problem, you don't need it because it's an automatic. Radio intact, but doesn't work? Another car that won't pass inspection in MA!
Thanks for the heads up Chris. Some members on 65gs.com were wondering if it was the same car. One of the guys commented the rear quarter panel work looked sub-par.... the body lines of the lower portion behind the wheels appear to be poorly reproduced with bondo.
Its pathetic. Its funny we have had probably half a dozen cars we have owned previously , all bought from the original owner or their surviving family and then read the ads that the seller writes and are made up. Its funny how someone will put that a car is from California when it spent its whole life in Ohio. Why people do it is beyond me!
It's all part of the mass participation in the decline of moral values and the rise of no boundaries greed.