455 in SL/GS...THROUGH BOLTS..USE TOP OR BOTTOM MM HOLES?

Discussion in 'The Bench' started by MARTIN FARMER, Oct 20, 2017.

  1. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    I want too make 100% Sure.
    A few have said they used TOP.
    These are tight and being a pain.
    Thanks for all the help on the 350/455 swap in the
    72 SLCustom/GSX Replica.
     
  2. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Top holes, you gotta tap them thru 90% of the time, alot of times you can take a long prybar and move stuff around to allow them to slip thru
     
  3. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Thanks hugger, they're being a pain.
     
  4. Jim Weise

    Jim Weise EFI/DIS 482

    A big tapered punch is always helpful. The engine mount is rubber, and it will move around with some persuasion.
     
  5. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Metal to metal and simply will not line up with top hole, with MM on eng or off by hand. Acts like March 1970 rubber has expanded.
    70 Estate Wagon set for 30 years.
    The 70 E.Wagon SF and MMs were in used bottom holes with the welded nuts, but I guess that was only on full size Buicks.
    Does it hurt to use bottoms or will it throw everything off and mess everything up or do I just get New 20171021_140730.jpg MMs? Thanks All
     
  6. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Can't use the bottom ones they won't even come close, use the cherry picker to pick up on the engine and maneuver it where it needs to go , ID put some fresh mounts in there tho while your rite there
     
  7. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Punch lines up front but not back.
    Does it harm anything to use BOTTOM holes on a Skylark?
     
  8. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Bottoms line up SUPER EASY, on engine and off.
     
  9. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Punch ..Bottoms line up 100% perfect..don't even have to pry, but I don't want to use them if they're not the right holes. Thanks 20171021_180409.jpg
     
  10. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Maybe because the rubber has expanded and pushed metal out? 1508624377636302090260.jpg
     
  11. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    All I had to do was lower eng and bottoms were 100% on, perfect, top no where close... Strange
    Will the 1" difference throw drivetain off.
    1972 Skylark Custom 350 4v replaced with SF from 1970 Estate Wagon
    bolted to TH350
    Thanks, I'm stuck
     
  12. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    :( Bottoms are 100% spot on, but I don't want to use them if the 1" difference is going to throw things off. All I've accomplished trying to force the tops is wasted 2 days and
    strained my back and gut, then this evening scored the oil pump cover while getting the punch stuck on Rt top.:eek:
    Has Anyone used the 1" lower bottoms.
    If it was just OK to use the bottoms, I'd have been done long ago.
    Thanks All
    20171021_142937.jpg
     
  13. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    I have never used nor had to use the bottom holes, and none certainly ever came there in an Abody, you will loose hood clearance, AC box clearance, trans tunnel clearance to a degree, headers and maybe even the manifolds may hit steering shaft, fan will hit the shroud etc,...IE will not work get new mounts and try
     
  14. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    I done one few weeks ago and the frame mounts were from OPGI and were JUNK, they weren't clearanced for the frame side bolts to pass thru and caused all kinds of issues till I pulled them out and put TA mounts in there
     
  15. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    These FMs and through bolts are Parts Place. Day of rest tomorrow, I need it..haha..can drive you crazy.:confused:
    Thanks Hugger
    Were the bottoms only used on Full size cars and why don't the tops have welded nuts like the bottoms?
    Thanks everyone.
     
  16. Jim Weise

    Jim Weise EFI/DIS 482

    Nuts welded on the mounts was a factory thing, and yes, the bottom hole is for the later big cars.

    At this point, my advice is to pull the motor up far enough to remove the mounts... then fit the engine mount to the frame bracket, to determine why the upper hole won't line up.

    Sometimes the engine mounts have a "nipple" on them, that has to fall into a slot machined into the face of the frame mount. I mention this, because when you run into this issue, the misalignment is about what you have there now.. so check for that, it will become obvious when you just set the motor mount on the pad, and try and slip the bolt thru.

    JW
     
  17. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    Thanks Jim. That's what I was doing in the 1st pick. Didn't see or feel a nipple. I'll check again. Thanks All, Mart
     
  18. MARTIN FARMER

    MARTIN FARMER Well-Known Member

    You're right Jim the nipple is there on the MMs and preventing the top holes from aligning. Can I just grind them off or do I need to get new MMs.
    You know, that was the 1st thing my Dad asked Fri evening "Is there a little tit on there that's supposed to fit in the notch".
    Always listen to your Father especially when they were an Air Force mechanic and Pipeliner.
    So it's safe to just grind off the nipples? 20171023_124216.jpg Thanks Jim, hugger and everyone.
    Mart
     
  19. john.schaefer77

    john.schaefer77 Well-Known Member

  20. Nicholas Sloop

    Nicholas Sloop '08 GS Nats BSA runner up

    No problem to grind the nipple. I had the same issue when I broke a MM in BG, and bought a used pass side to use on the left. (Figured it would have less wear and tear...) Dave Hemker's brain and John Schmidt's tools saved me.
     

Share This Page