Modifying stock iron intake manifold

Discussion in 'Street/strip 400/430/455' started by matt68gs400, Aug 15, 2017.

  1. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

    IMG_8882.JPG IMG_8809.jpg IMG_8810.jpg Any good articles on milling modifying the stock iron intake at the carb base? To make it more like a B4B, etc? Also, after doing mods, is it anywhere near the B4B?

    Thanks,

    Matt
     
  2. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    rps20170815_164301.jpg rps20170815_164327.jpg rps20170815_164342.jpg
     
    matt68gs400 likes this.
  3. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    The above supported 510 HP thru Qjet stock manifolds and iron heads
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2017
    GranSportSedan and matt68gs400 like this.
  4. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

    That's awesome
     
  5. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

    Thanks Ethan. How far down is the center divider from the carb base?

    Do you have the cross over blocked?
     
  6. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Close to 3/4 in , crossover was blocked in the heads
     
    matt68gs400 likes this.
  7. TrunkMonkey

    TrunkMonkey Totally bananas

  8. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

  9. Stevem

    Stevem Well-Known Member

    You will get better cylinder to cylinder power balance out of the stock Intake and power if you have room for atleast a 1/2" tall open Carb spacer as this helps to make up for the lack of turning radius into the shallow Plenum.

    You still must grind out primary to secondary dividers on the iron intake , but this mod works better for the sake of drivability below 2500 rpm then just grinding down the iron wall divider on the stock Manifold.

    The ideal spacer to work with will be a little smaller then what the stock Plenum is now, as on the shallow side of the Plenum this will allow you to grind in a radius from the entrance of the spacer ( top side) into the shallow side Plenum.
     
    matt68gs400 likes this.
  10. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

    Thank you. What happens if I put on an open spacer and left the spreadbore intake for now?

    Seems like that would be bad going from spreadbore to open (square bore) spacer then back to the original spreadbore on the intake.

    Right now I just have a very thick spreadbore gasket below the carb and virgin intake manifold.
     
  11. Stevem

    Stevem Well-Known Member

    I did not post up to use a open square bore spacer, you use a open spread bore one if that's the Carb your running.
    If you leave the stock front to rear dividers in place they will act like air flow restriction and you might as well skip using a open spacer and just run a 4 hole spread bore spacer.
     
  12. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

    Ok, that's what I thought.
     
  13. Stevem

    Stevem Well-Known Member

    Let me detail this more.
    Adding a non open spacer will always help with the fuel distribution into the shallow Plenum and to a lesser degree air flow so these will help in terms of power production, but not as much on the top end rpm power production end of things as a open spacer.
     
    matt68gs400 likes this.
  14. Rob Ross

    Rob Ross Well-Known Member

    It's worth about 9 hp and 12 ft lbs, I compared a stock one to a modified one on a dyno years ago.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2017
    GranSportSedan likes this.
  15. Rob Ross

    Rob Ross Well-Known Member

    Here you go!
    upload_2017-8-16_13-57-38.png
     
    matt68gs400 likes this.
  16. Rob Ross

    Rob Ross Well-Known Member

    A plot of the data from above.

    upload_2017-8-16_14-2-0.png
     
    matt68gs400 likes this.
  17. 87GN_70GS

    87GN_70GS Well-Known Member

    Do you have pics or details of your mods to this manifold?
     
  18. Rob Ross

    Rob Ross Well-Known Member

    I don't, it was a long time ago that we ran that. Basically made it look like a B4B. No other porting or massaging. Similar to what Hugger shows but the divider was not lowered.
     
  19. matt68gs400

    matt68gs400 Well-Known Member

    FullSizeRender.jpg
    Marked it up with sharpies. The silver sharpie is the areas I propose to remove. The black and unmarked parts will be left original. Made a mistake the first go and didn't realize the center divide turned under the secondaries but just covered the silver with some black once it was dry. I'm thinking I'll keep the center piece its original height and add a notch by the secondaries like the B4B, unless there's any reason to lower it more for a mild 455?

    Hugger, I noticed on the two outside edges, you kept a little "bump" of material. Is this for more gasket support?
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2017
  20. hugger

    hugger Well-Known Member

    Correct for gasket support, the notch on the B4B's was just for throttle blade clearance for the Holley 3barrel that was popular back then the newer B4B's and current ones just run the performer pad. The performance increase comes from adding plenum volume, with out dropping the center and running a 1/4in gasket no gains will be had IMO.
     

Share This Page