1. If you have recently registered with a gmail email address, you must contact me, as gmail will not forward our confirmation email to you. Contact me and jim@trishieldperformance.com to complete your registration.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. In and effort to reduce the spam on the site, several years ago I had went to a program where I manually approve each and every new registration. This approval gives you full access to the site, to pictures, and to post, among other things. To be able to enjoy the full potential of the board for you, you need to be fully registered.. and that's easy.. Just send an email to me at jim@trishieldperformance.com and I will verify your registration. This policy will remain in effect indefinitely, as it has completely eliminated the bad actors from our site, who would spam and hack it, once they gained access. Thanks JW
    Dismiss Notice
  3. The "Group Buy" for the 1967-68 Deluxe Steering wheel recasting is now officially "Open". Now is the time to start sending in the wheels. The latest date that the wheels must be received by Kochs is 31 March 2025 The cost for each wheel is $750. The only "up front cost" is your shipping the wheel. If you send in more than one wheel, each additional wheel will cost $700. Shipping and insurance to Kochs and return shipping will be extra. You will be contacted by Teresa to make payment for the wheel(s) and return shipping and insurance when your wheel(s) is complete. The shipping will be factored on your delivery address and insurance. I will be sending the contact information all of you have sent me to Teresa at Kochs. Send in your wheels, horn pad and hardware and paint color sample if applicable. Please include: First and Last Name Shipping Address Phone number email address V8Buick "Member Name" Wheel Color (SEE THE BOTTOM FOR WHEEL COLOR) Pease read the "shipping to Kochs" below. There are two addresses. One for USPS Mailing One for FedEx and UPS shipping You can use USPS/Mail, UPS or FedEx to send in your core. Use the appropriate address depending on what service you use to ship. If you use USPS/Mail ship to: Koch's P.O. Box 959 Acton, CA 93510 Attn: Teresa If you use UPS or FedEx ship to: Koch's 7650 Soledad Canyon Road Acton CA 93510 Attn: Teresa Kochs Contact: Teresa (661) 268-1341 customerservice@kochs.com Wheel Color If you wheel is Black, you can list that in your information you send in with your wheel. For colored wheels, please contact Teresa about specifics for wheel color if you do not send in a color sample to match. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you to everyone for your participation in making this a reality. And "Thank You" Jim Weise, for allowing and facilitating this project! Michael .................... to remove this notice, click the X in the upper RH corner of this message box
    Dismiss Notice

Big Cubes vs. Small Cubes

Discussion in 'Race 400/430/455' started by Staged70Lark, Nov 30, 2004.

  1. Staged70Lark

    Staged70Lark Well-Known Member

    Brian,

    Interesting comparison between Bruce's 494 and this 464 that you just dynoed.

    An out of the box style Stg 2... depending on what out of the box is... will result in a peak flow number of 270 to 290 cfm. So.... if we go by the rule of thumb of 2.2 hp per cfm your results would be 270 x2.2 = 594 ph or 290 x 2.2 = 638 hp. I have seen a very good engine produce around 2.4 hp per cfm so lets say 270 x 2.4 = 648 or 290 x 2.4 = 696. So the hp numbers between the two engines are fairly close.

    The BIG difference in the numbers you have posted is the torque. Bruce's engine makes 657 and this 464 is making 620 ft lbs. That is 37 ft lbs of torque.... that is a huge difference. I dont know what that would equate to in ET but I would think you would see a big difference.

    It seems it would be safe to say that HP is pretty much based on the amount of air the cylinder heads can flow but the added stroke would definately increase the torque??? Which in turn relates to quicker ET???

    All I know is that when I hit the lottery.... we will all know the answer to these questions!!!

    Later
     
  2. Jeff Kitchen

    Jeff Kitchen Well-Known Member

    On the first point, I think there is alot more to it than that. Which I'm sure you're aware of.

    I disagree on the second part. The added stroke will increase torque in lower RPM's, yes. That won't necessarily make for for a quicker ET, and if you tune it to the max it probably won't result in a better ET. I believe in making the most horsepower you can, which means RPM's too, and use the gearing and converter to get it moving. This is all within reason, of course. You need a certain amount of low RPM torque to get a 3600 lb car moving. But, out of the two engines compared above, I would choose the 464, and dial in the converter to make it launch.

    Check your datalogger and find out how much time you really spend in the lower RPM range. What good is low RPM torque if you never use it?

    This is a very interesting thread. We haven't had one of these in awhile.

    Just my opinion. Have fun.
     
  3. FCOOFRAZ3

    FCOOFRAZ3 Whiteboy

    Is the stock rod length used with these bigger stroke combinations. I have had an crank offset ground and would like to know before they put it in the block if there is a need of changing the rods.
     
  4. standup 69

    standup 69 standup69

    how many people are running stage 4 heads in a serious n/a appliction? The reason I ask this is because we seem to compare stage 1 2 and 3 headed engines with the big inch strokers and the volume of these heads especially the pinch area is too small. you can get good flow numbers with these heads but if you cant feed the volume the engine won't use the cfm to it's potential. The stage 4 head on the other hand has more cross sectional width in the port to more adequitly fill the cubic inches.If money would allow me to experiment with this I would,so any feedback from someone who has would be interesting ?
     
  5. jadebird

    jadebird Well-Known Member

    What kind of flow numbers did these heads have? What was the compression on the 464?
    ________
    Yamaha Ox99-11
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2011
  6. buick535

    buick535 Well-Known Member



    The rod length typically will vary with the different stroker combinations. When you are building a stroker, the piston and rod are both aftermarket anyway, typically not the stock Buick length. There are alot of factors to consider when doing a stroker. Jim Burek
     
  7. Earick Racing

    Earick Racing Member

    The 464 is 11:1 compression and the cylinder heads flow 290cfm. The 494 was just shy of 12:1 compression. We never had the 494s cylinder heads on the flow bench.
     
  8. Buicks4Speed

    Buicks4Speed Advanced Member

    Bore and head flow

    Has anyone checked to see what the gains are with the 4.500 bore on the flow bench for a Buick head? I know there are guys like myself with the Stg 3 2.25 valve in the small 4.350 bore which can be tight. I know that there has been alot over the years with the right valve to work with the bore and I've never seen the 2.25 valve not hurt the 4.350 bore but will that change on a 4.500?
     
  9. jadebird

    jadebird Well-Known Member

    Thanks. Those are some amazing numbers for that head flow and compression!
    ________
    Lovely Wendie
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2011
  10. Earick Racing

    Earick Racing Member

    We have tested the cylinder heads on as large as a 4.600 bore with no noticeable flow difference.
     
  11. standup 69

    standup 69 standup69

    Rick I tested with a 4.45 bore and a standard bore. no big gains, however we did cut the valves down to 2.22 for the stage 3 heads. they flow over 300 cfm at only .400 lift and max out at just over 360. no messing with the head bolt boss.
     
  12. BirdDog

    BirdDog Well-Known Member

    I know its apples and oranges...but...Top Fuel motors are less than 500 cubic inches and make 6000+ horsepower. That's just mind boggling. They also use a 3.23 (i think) gear ratio.

    Just wanted to throw a curve ball at everyone.
     
  13. Gmachine Lark

    Gmachine Lark Well-Known Member

    Hey guys,
    This has been an interesting thread . My buick is just street car. My race car is basically a 500 inch pro stock car less about 40 cubic inches. It has an ultra short deck(9.200) big bore (4.622) and a baby stroke(3.41) . The problem with the IHRA stuff is inefficiency. The run undersquare(bigger stroke than bore) and they are just plain heavy. The best way to accelerate a drag car is to make it light . Same thing with the rotating assembly. The tall deck of the new Buick block, although you can go to a bigger bore will still leave a heavy rotating assembly --longer rod ,pushrods etc.
    The heads on my race car flow over 500 cfm on the intake side. I shift it at 9200 and go through the lights at 9500. I can do that because the stuff is lite and the bearing speed is low. The mains are BBC but the rods are Honda size. The crank is a winberg and it is tiny(never weighed it)
    Big bore capabiltiy is great but a 4.5 x4.5 motor is a really good motor for a boat. Lotsa torque.
    Here's the bad news on my stuff.
    Rods every 50 runs
    valve springs every 10 runs(about $400 a set)
    Kills jesel rocker gear pretty regularly( Intake lift close to an inch)

    I think the new block is a cool thing but I think the other short comings ( one combo works and another doesnt) will appear when the motors start to get built.
    Good luck guys
    George
     
  14. alan

    alan High-tech Dinosaur

    Ouch!! I need to stay away from that! :shock:
     
  15. buicksstage1

    buicksstage1 Well-Known Member

    Comp Donkey Is Right!!!!!

    Yes, the famous comp donkey :sleep:This thing can't spin the skin of a grape! This guy was all cocky about this new stove, he was going to set the world on fire, and get him deep into the nines. This is just a mini pro-stock motor, dry sump, vacuum pump, sheet metal intake, dual dominators, and the roller cam is huge in this thing, he tows it back from the end of the track to save the valve springs that are good for about thirty passes. When he went to get his NHRA licence so he could run the nines. The car wouldnt even get into the nines, and has earned the nickname comp donkey at the local tracks. Adam's car is heavier, makes less power, and is a street car. I have personally driven Adam's car on the street, and it runs the same number as the comp donkey... low tens. If I was this guy, I would retire from drag racing and take up knitting. There is no replacement for displacement. Chris
     
  16. Gmachine Lark

    Gmachine Lark Well-Known Member

    I understand what you guys are saying but this sounds like a combination problem. My motor makes only about 850 ft of torque. If I put that peaky thing in a 3000 pound car it would be a dog too. The camshaft is wrong ,too much port volume,etc.
    On the flip side there is super modified class in comp which is probably one of the most expensive classes in comp that has 2700 to 3100 pound cars with small cubic inch small blocks. A/supermods are in the eights with splayed valve small blocks, two carbs and five speeds.
    I see that this fellow is having trouble but that might be his issue not that it cant be done .
    Comp is one of the most difficult and expensive sportman classes in drag racing and this is why the class is in trouble going forward. There arent many newcomers and fans dont get it .When I tell people I run comp they think "super comp" and when they see it from the stands they dont understand what "index" racing is.
    I can tell you from the drivers seat that its about $150k difference. If your not ready to spend that kind of dough and gather the knowledge base to race comp there are too many other classes to have real fun with. Sometime I miss hanging out between rounds and looking at other cars in the staging lanes or whatever.
    By the way, if that thing is an 11,000 rpm motor and he only swaps valve springs every thirty runs , then his whole program is off track. Its not just lift its also harmonics and stability that kills them . Our stuff shows a drop at the seat after one pass.At ten we swap the exhausts to the intakes and put new springs on the intakes and throw those ten pass old intake springs in the trash.
    By the way those springs are about $370 a set.
    Should I tell you about our clutch maintenance ?
    Have fun .
    George
     
  17. Gmachine Lark

    Gmachine Lark Well-Known Member

    By the way,
    the bore and stroke that makes the 572 combination is a good marine application.That doesnt mean it wont work at the dragstrip. For raw hp the 540 and 555s tend to outperform. With this new block you are getting into Big block chevy combos and studying those might help.
    good luck
    George
     
  18. buicksstage1

    buicksstage1 Well-Known Member

    Cam Shaft

    I told "big head" when he bought the comp motor that the cam shaft and heads wouldn't work with his combo but he just looked at me like I had 3 heads :Do No: I love running side by side with the comp donkey :laugh: I'm the same weight, stock block ,crank,rods,Ta intake and 2" headers,308s cam,1 carb not 2, stock stroke.....ok ok I'll stop now..George,I hope you under stand are respect for comp racing, we love the class.This is a great example about how having the wrong combo can slow you down big time. If you met this knob at the track he would tell how fast and wonderful he is, the time slips don't lie........Chris
     
  19. Gmachine Lark

    Gmachine Lark Well-Known Member

    I hear ya.
    There is so much to getting these combinations down the track.They are not for the faint of heart.Thats kind of why I like my Buick. Its strong ,runs all day at 180 degrees and punishes the tires pretty much at will on 93 octane.
    I am thinking about dointg a set of stage II heads to help the car handle and give it a bit more power upstairs.
    Is there a stage II shorty header? My car sits pretty low AND is a 5 speed. Linkages might be a problem with a big tube header.
    Next time you see your buddy give him two words--Clutch management
    Take care
    George
     
  20. standup 69

    standup 69 standup69

    George there is a shorty header from ta performance I think you can get it in 2''. our buddy tom from alberta runs them on his streetcar and it runs real strong for how mild the combo is. it runs 11:50's on pump gas with a tiny little cam ,steel wheels,3:73s and not much else. :3gears:
     

Share This Page