1. If you have recently registered with a gmail email address, you must contact me, as gmail will not forward our confirmation email to you. Contact me and jim@trishieldperformance.com to complete your registration.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. In and effort to reduce the spam on the site, several years ago I had went to a program where I manually approve each and every new registration. This approval gives you full access to the site, to pictures, and to post, among other things. To be able to enjoy the full potential of the board for you, you need to be fully registered.. and that's easy.. Just send an email to me at jim@trishieldperformance.com and I will verify your registration. This policy will remain in effect indefinitely, as it has completely eliminated the bad actors from our site, who would spam and hack it, once they gained access. Thanks JW
    Dismiss Notice
  3. The "Group Buy" for the 1967-68 Deluxe Steering wheel recasting is now officially "Open". Now is the time to start sending in the wheels. The latest date that the wheels must be received by Kochs is 31 March 2025 The cost for each wheel is $750. The only "up front cost" is your shipping the wheel. If you send in more than one wheel, each additional wheel will cost $700. Shipping and insurance to Kochs and return shipping will be extra. You will be contacted by Teresa to make payment for the wheel(s) and return shipping and insurance when your wheel(s) is complete. The shipping will be factored on your delivery address and insurance. I will be sending the contact information all of you have sent me to Teresa at Kochs. Send in your wheels, horn pad and hardware and paint color sample if applicable. Please include: First and Last Name Shipping Address Phone number email address V8Buick "Member Name" Wheel Color (SEE THE BOTTOM FOR WHEEL COLOR) Pease read the "shipping to Kochs" below. There are two addresses. One for USPS Mailing One for FedEx and UPS shipping You can use USPS/Mail, UPS or FedEx to send in your core. Use the appropriate address depending on what service you use to ship. If you use USPS/Mail ship to: Koch's P.O. Box 959 Acton, CA 93510 Attn: Teresa If you use UPS or FedEx ship to: Koch's 7650 Soledad Canyon Road Acton CA 93510 Attn: Teresa Kochs Contact: Teresa (661) 268-1341 customerservice@kochs.com Wheel Color If you wheel is Black, you can list that in your information you send in with your wheel. For colored wheels, please contact Teresa about specifics for wheel color if you do not send in a color sample to match. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you to everyone for your participation in making this a reality. And "Thank You" Jim Weise, for allowing and facilitating this project! Michael .................... to remove this notice, click the X in the upper RH corner of this message box
    Dismiss Notice

Home 455 Reconstruction

Discussion in 'Street/strip 400/430/455' started by cray1801, May 8, 2003.

  1. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    I've got Hyper pistons .030" over and the recommended TA rings. In this case I'll have what I have, I don't have the luxury of controlling the exact piston to wall clearance. Ring gap spec. recommendations would be great so at least I could open them if they are on the tight side.

    I guess I should go about .022" end gap on the top ring, I found this after a search, sound right? I think my pistons came from Poston's.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2003
  2. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    Well I'm back in town and I just picked up my block, crank, rods/pistons this morning. I checked the main bearings at home and they are on the loose side. Can't you take a piece of sand paper and a flat board and slide the (empty) cap back and forth over it to reduce your clearance?

    Here are the clearances; #1 .0030", #2 .0027", #3 .0025", #4 .0026" and #5 .0025". I want to reduce the clearances of #1 - #4 to .0020".

    Thanks to Kerry S. for the rods! It turns out the #1 rod, the rod with the spun bearing, was bent and had to be replaced.

    Here are the weights the shop gave me after reconditioning the "new" rod.

    Piston 784 g (.030" Hyper's)
    Piston pin 220 g
    Total rod 736 g
    Recip. end of rod 242 g
    Rot. end of rod 494

    These numbers look about right? I know I've got some pretty heavy components here.
     
  3. Jim Weise

    Jim Weise EFI/DIS 482

    Oh... mercy no...

    The only way to fix that is to have the block re-line honed. You have race motor main clearances now.. that will give you lower oil pressure at idle, but there will be no other bad side effects. You will prolly 15-20 psi, with a straight 40 race oil.

    If you want it more toward my street motor specs, then have it re-line honed.. otherwise run it..

    JW
     
  4. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    I've heard you can do this with the rod caps, why can't you do this with the main caps? I'm only talking a .0005" reduction in clearance :(
     
  5. Jim Weise

    Jim Weise EFI/DIS 482

    Craig,

    Let's think this thru..

    What happens to a round hole, when you split it at the middle, and then remove material from one side..

    The hole is out of round.

    even .0005.. my max acceptable out of round, for a bore, is .0002, up to about 15* from the parting line. On occasion, I have run some of my personal stuff up to .0005, but have not liked it..

    Your likely to do more harm that good by fussing with the bottom of the main or rod caps.

    JW
     
  6. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    Thanks for the input Jim, keeping things within 2 tenths sounds good.

    Next, rear seal question. The instructions mention using RTV, "apply a thin coat of RTV material to the bearing cap chamfer and to the cap mating surface adjacent to the seal NOT ON THE SEAL END".

    Does this mean to apply the RTV to the groove (block and cap) before installing the seals? Here's the II's from TA
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Jim Weise

    Jim Weise EFI/DIS 482

    Yes,

    A very small amount behind the seal, and a thin film on the cap parting line surface.

    Be careful not go get any on the seal end, especially the end that will be below the parting line surface of the block and cap.

    JW
     
  8. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    Look at this #3 rod bearing installation. I've tried different (new) bearings and with each one an end extends above the mating surface when the other end is flush. I've only seen this with this rod. This rod, and all other rods except #1, are un-touched from last assembly.

    I know main bearings are labeled but rod bearings can go on either side (rod or cap).

    Is there a measurment that can be taken from this rod to identify the problem?

    Installing this rod/bearing would result in crushing the end of the bearing, right?
     

    Attached Files:

  9. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    Well, I checked the cap/bearing install and the reverse case is evident there (the bearing does not quite come up to the mating surface). How often does this happen? Anything I should double check or do to ensure functionality?

    I'll measure the diameter of the rod/cap without the bearing...What should this dimension be?
     
  10. cray1801

    cray1801 Too much is just right.

    Well I looked back at one of Jim W.'s posts.

    Now, the Rod bore, without the bearing, should be 2.3740-2.3745, and with the bearing, in a .010 under deal, I typically want to see 2.2410, on everything but race motors.

    I got 2.3733" top to bottom and 2.3750 bolt to bolt, not ideal but the circumference should be very close. :confused:
     
  11. Jim Weise

    Jim Weise EFI/DIS 482

    Craig,

    Measure the rod end with the bearing in it.. torqued up.

    I think your going to find that the clearance is pretty dang tight, if your crank is a "standard" spec regrind.

    I often grind my cranks to the low side of the standard spec, which is 2.2388-2.2390

    with a 2.2410 rod bearing diameter, you have your 0020-.0022 rod clearance.

    Now, measure your rod dia, without the bearing, at about 45* from the parting line.

    If it varies more than .0005 from the vertical dimension to the 45* dimension, I would suggest a re-size. I think you going to have to dust those out anyhow, to get the rod clearance to where it should be. You can just bring them to your machinist with them all torqued up, and ask him to just put them on his rod hone, and bring the vertical dimension up to at least the bottom of the spec.

    Stock rods can be a real pain to re-size.. due to the fact that the original bolts did not align the cap real well.. it's referred to as "doweling up" on the bolts.. IF the big end was bored originally with the cap not centered on the original bolts, then it was fine with the sloppy stock bolts, but when you put the ARPs in, then you end up with a cap that is shifted way off to one side, as it now dowels up on the new bolts. The only way to fix that is to cut a bunch of the rod, and then resize it, to get the cap side of the bore to line back up with the rod side of the bore.. and then you end up with a rod that is short.. and stock rods vary in length to being with, and this can compound this issue.

    I can't ever recall seeing a bearing stick up that far about the parting line of the cap. It almost looks like the rod was made that way.. but I am not familiar with the exact process used to manufacture the rods... but I imagine that the rods were forged, with the big end in one piece, and then they were cut... maybe that one was cut off center. Not a real big issue, as long as the sizing is correct, and the rod bore fits perfectly with the cap bore.

    Typically 1 or 2 rods out of every set have this cap misalignment problem, and are discarded.

    And what your seeing with this rod size deal, can directly related to the rod bearing failure you had.

    FIX IT!

    JW
     

Share This Page